Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuangphakdy, Viviane
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Esteban
dc.contributor.authorShinohara, Kentaro
dc.contributor.authorPan, Hui
dc.contributor.authorHefferan, Theresa
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Thomas W.
dc.contributor.authorStockdale, Linda
dc.contributor.authorSaini, Sunil
dc.contributor.authorDadsetan, Mahrokh
dc.contributor.authorRunge, M. Brett
dc.contributor.authorVasanji, Amit
dc.contributor.authorYaszemski, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMuschler, George F.
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, Linda G.
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-20T19:30:35Z
dc.date.available2015-10-20T19:30:35Z
dc.date.issued2013-01
dc.date.submitted2012-05
dc.identifier.issn1937-3341
dc.identifier.issn1937-335X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99374
dc.description.abstractTreatment of large segmental bone defects remains an unsolved clinical challenge, despite a wide array of existing bone graft materials. This project was designed to rapidly assess and compare promising biodegradable osteoconductive scaffolds for use in the systematic development of new bone regeneration methodologies that combine scaffolds, sources of osteogenic cells, and bioactive scaffold modifications. Promising biomaterials and scaffold fabrication methods were identified in laboratories at Rutgers, MIT, Integra Life Sciences, and Mayo Clinic. Scaffolds were fabricated from various materials, including poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), poly(L-lactide-co-ɛ-caprolactone) (PLCL), tyrosine-derived polycarbonate (TyrPC), and poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF). Highly porous three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds were fabricated by 3D printing, laser stereolithography, or solvent casting followed by porogen leaching. The canine femoral multi-defect model was used to systematically compare scaffold performance and enable selection of the most promising substrate(s) on which to add cell sourcing options and bioactive surface modifications. Mineralized cancellous allograft (MCA) was used to provide a comparative reference to the current clinical standard for osteoconductive scaffolds. Percent bone volume within the defect was assessed 4 weeks after implantation using both MicroCT and limited histomorphometry. Bone formed at the periphery of all scaffolds with varying levels of radial ingrowth. MCA produced a rapid and advanced stage of bone formation and remodeling throughout the defect in 4 weeks, greatly exceeding the performance of all polymer scaffolds. Two scaffold constructs, TyrPC[subscript PL]/TCP and PPF4[subscript SLA]/HA[subscript PLGA Dip], proved to be significantly better than alternative PLGA and PLCL scaffolds, justifying further development. MCA remains the current standard for osteoconductive scaffolds.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Office of Naval Researchen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Air Force. Office of the Surgeon Generalen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Navyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Veterans Administrationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCleveland Clinic Foundationen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc.en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0289en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceMary Ann Leiberten_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Osteoconductive Scaffolds in the Canine Femoral Multi-Defect Modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationLuangphakdy, Viviane, Esteban Walker, Kentaro Shinohara, Hui Pan, Theresa Hefferan, Thomas W. Bauer, Linda Stockdale, et al. “Evaluation of Osteoconductive Scaffolds in the Canine Femoral Multi-Defect Model.” Tissue Engineering Part A 19, no. 5–6 (March 2013): 634–648. © 2013 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorStockdale, Lindaen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorGriffith, Linda G.en_US
dc.relation.journalTissue Engineering Part Aen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsLuangphakdy, Viviane; Walker, Esteban; Shinohara, Kentaro; Pan, Hui; Hefferan, Theresa; Bauer, Thomas W.; Stockdale, Linda; Saini, Sunil; Dadsetan, Mahrokh; Runge, M. Brett; Vasanji, Amit; Griffith, Linda; Yaszemski, Michael; Muschler, George F.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1801-5548
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record