Constructing Consequences for Noncompliance: The Case of Academic Laboratories
Author(s)
Huising, Ruthanne; Silbey, Susan S.
Downloadhusing and silbey feb 25.pdf (94.98Kb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We examine academic research laboratories as examples of intractable governance sites. These spaces often elude regulatory warnings and rules because of the professional status of faculty members, the opacity of scientific work to outsiders, and loose coupling of policy and practice in organizations. We describe one university’s efforts to create a system for managing laboratory health, safety, and environmental hazards, thereby constraining conventional faculty habit to ignore administrative and legal procedures. We demonstrate the specific struggles safety managers face in creating system responsiveness, that is, feedback to re-channel noncompliant laboratory practices. We show how faculty members are buffered from the consequences of their activities, thus impeding the goals of responsibility and accountability. We conclude by asking where such pockets of intractability reside in other organizations and whether the surrounding buffer, if there is one, may nonetheless paradoxically create an effective margin of safety.
Date issued
2013-09Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Anthropology ProgramJournal
The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Publisher
Sage Publications
Citation
Huising, R., and S. S. Silbey. “Constructing Consequences for Noncompliance: The Case of Academic Laboratories.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 649, no. 1 (August 2, 2013): 157–177.
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
0002-7162
1552-3349