Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarla, Lavanya
dc.contributor.authorVaaben, Bo
dc.contributor.authorBarnhart, Cynthia
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-26T19:00:02Z
dc.date.available2018-07-26T19:00:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.date.submitted2011-06
dc.identifier.issn0041-1655
dc.identifier.issn1526-5447
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/117146
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we present a novel approach addressing airline delays and recovery. Airline schedule recovery involves making decisions during operations to minimize additional operating costs while getting back on schedule as quickly as possible. The mechanisms used include aircraft swaps, flight cancellations, crew swaps, reserve crews, and passenger rebookings. In this context, we introduce another mechanism, namely flight planning that enables flight speed changes. Flight planning is the process of determining flight plan(s) specifying the route of a flight, its speed, and its associated fuel burn. Our key idea in integrating flight planning and disruption management is to adjust the speeds of flights during operations, trading off flying time (and along with it, block time) and fuel burn; in combination with existing mechanisms, such as flight holds. Our goal is striking the right balance of fuel costs and passenger-related delay costs incurred by the airline.We present both exact and approximate models for integrated aircraft and passenger recovery with flight planning. From computational experiments on data provided by a European airline, we estimate that the ability of our approach to control (decrease or increase) flying time by trading off with fuel burn, as well as to hold downstream flights, results in reductions in passenger disruptions by approximately 66%-83%, accompanied by small increases in fuel burn of 0.152%-0.155% and a total cost savings of approximately 5.7%-5.9% for the airline, may be achieved compared to baseline approaches typically used in practice. We discuss the relative benefits of two mechanisms studied-specifically, flight speed changes and intentionally holding flight departures, and show significant synergies in applying these mechanisms. The results, compared with recovery without integrated flight planning, are because of increased swap possibilities during recovery, decreased numbers of flight cancellations, and fewer disruptions to passengers.en_US
dc.publisherInstitute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1287/TRSC.2015.0609en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceOther univ. web domainen_US
dc.titleIntegrated Disruption Management and Flight Planning to Trade Off Delays and Fuel Burnen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMarla, Lavanya, Bo Vaaben, and Cynthia Barnhart. “Integrated Disruption Management and Flight Planning to Trade Off Delays and Fuel Burn.” Transportation Science 51, 1 (February 2017): 88–111 © 2017 INFORMSen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorBarnhart, Cynthia
dc.relation.journalTransportation Scienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-07-26T17:10:03Z
dspace.orderedauthorsMarla, Lavanya; Vaaben, Bo; Barnhart, Cynthiaen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2431-2706
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record