Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDedoussi, Irene Constantina
dc.contributor.authorAllroggen, Florian
dc.contributor.authorFlanagan, Robert
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Tyler
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Brandon
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Steven R. H.
dc.contributor.authorBoyce, James K
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-26T14:55:12Z
dc.date.available2020-06-26T14:55:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.date.submitted2019-07
dc.identifier.issn1748-9326
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125997
dc.description.abstractFossil fuel combustion releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere along with co-pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and others. These emissions result in environmental externalities primarily in terms of climate and air quality. Here we quantify the cost of co-pollutant emissions per ton of CO2 emissions from US electric power generation. We measure the co-pollutant cost of carbon (CPCC) as the total value of statistical life associated with US-based premature mortalities attributable to co-pollutant emissions, per mass of CO2. We find an average CPCC of ~$45 per metric ton (mt) of CO2 for the year 2011 (in 2017 USD). This is ~20% higher than the central Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) measure of climate damages that was used by the Obama administration in its regulatory impact analysis for the Clean Power Plan (CPP), and >8 times higher than the SCC used by the Trump administration in its analysis for the Plan's repeal. At the state-level, the CPCC ranged from ~$7/mt CO2 for Arizona to ~$96/mt CO2 for New Jersey. We calculate the CPCC trends from 2002 to 2017 and find a 71% decrease at the national level, contributing to total savings of ~$1 trillion in averted mortality from power plant emissions over this period. By decomposing the aggregate and fuel-specific co-pollutant intensities into simultaneous (CO2-driven) and autonomous components, we conclude that the CPCC trends originated mainly from targeted efforts to reduce co-pollutant emissions, e.g. through fuel switching (from coal to natural gas) and autonomous changes in co-pollutant emissions. The results suggest that the overall benefit to society from policies to curtail carbon emissions may be enhanced by focusing on pollution sources where the associated air-quality co-benefits are greatest. At the same time, continued efforts to reduce co-pollutant intensities, if technologically feasible, could help to mitigate the air-quality damages of the CPP's repeal and replacement.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitute for New Economic Thinking (INET) (Grant INO15-00008)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUS EPA (grant RD-83587201)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIOP Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1088/1748-9326/ab34e3en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceIOP Publishingen_US
dc.titleThe co-pollutant cost of carbon emissions: an analysis of the US electric power generation sectoren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationDedoussi, Irene C., et al. "The co-pollutant cost of carbon emissions: an analysis of the US electric power generation sector." Environmental Research Letters 14,9 (2019): 094003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab34e3 © 2019 Author(s)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Research Lettersen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-10-24T12:22:22Z
dspace.date.submission2019-10-24T12:22:27Z
mit.journal.volume14en_US
mit.journal.issue9en_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record