Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorris, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorPostlewaite, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-11T19:25:50Z
dc.date.available2021-06-11T19:25:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0035-2764
dc.identifier.issn1950-6694
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130932
dc.description.abstractResume: Dans cette note, nous donnons un exemple élémentaire avec une fonction d’utilité concave où la règle d’épargne essentiellement unique et consistante est discontinue ; une telle règle d’épargne ne peut pas survenir avec une fonction d’escompte exponentielle. Abstract: In this note we provide an elementary example with a concave utility function where the essentially unique consistent savings rule is discontinuous; such a savings rule could not arise with exponential discounting.en_US
dc.publisherCAIRNen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.3917/reco.712.0313en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Morris via Nicholas Albaughen_US
dc.titleObservational Implications of Non-Exponential Discountingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMorris, Stephen and Andrew Postlewaite. "Observational Implications of Non-Exponential Discounting." Dans Revue économique 71, 2 (2020): 313-321. © 2021 Cairn.infoen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economicsen_US
dc.relation.journalDans Revue économiqueen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.date.submission2021-06-09T18:26:28Z
mit.journal.volume71en_US
mit.journal.issue2en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record