MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

On the optimal space complexity of consensus for anonymous processes

Author(s)
Gelashvili, Rati
Thumbnail
Download446_2018_331_ReferencePDF.pdf (182.5Kb)
Publisher Policy

Publisher Policy

Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.

Terms of use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Abstract The optimal space complexity of consensus in asynchronous shared memory was an open problem for two decades. For a system of n processes, no algorithm using a sublinear number of registers is known. Up until very recently, the best known lower bound due to Fich, Herlihy, and Shavit was $${\varOmega }(\sqrt{n})$$ Ω ( n ) registers. Fich, Herlihy, and Shavit first proved their lower bound for the special case of the problem where processes are anonymous (i.e. they run the same algorithm) and then extended it to the general case. In this paper we close the gap for the anonymous case of the problem. We show that any consensus algorithm from read–write registers for anonymous processes that satisfies nondeterministic solo termination has to use $${\varOmega }(n)$$ Ω ( n ) registers in some execution. This implies an $${\varOmega }(n)$$ Ω ( n ) lower bound on the space complexity of deterministic obstruction-free and randomized wait-free consensus, matching the upper bound. We introduce new techniques for marshalling anonymous processes and their executions, in particular, the concepts of leader–follower pairs and reserving executions, that play a critical role in the lower bound argument and will hopefully be more generally applicable.
Date issued
2018-03-23
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131297
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Collections
  • MIT Open Access Articles

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.