Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGelashvili, Rati
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-17T18:01:49Z
dc.date.available2021-09-17T18:01:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131297
dc.description.abstractAbstract The optimal space complexity of consensus in asynchronous shared memory was an open problem for two decades. For a system of n processes, no algorithm using a sublinear number of registers is known. Up until very recently, the best known lower bound due to Fich, Herlihy, and Shavit was $${\varOmega }(\sqrt{n})$$ Ω ( n ) registers. Fich, Herlihy, and Shavit first proved their lower bound for the special case of the problem where processes are anonymous (i.e. they run the same algorithm) and then extended it to the general case. In this paper we close the gap for the anonymous case of the problem. We show that any consensus algorithm from read–write registers for anonymous processes that satisfies nondeterministic solo termination has to use $${\varOmega }(n)$$ Ω ( n ) registers in some execution. This implies an $${\varOmega }(n)$$ Ω ( n ) lower bound on the space complexity of deterministic obstruction-free and randomized wait-free consensus, matching the upper bound. We introduce new techniques for marshalling anonymous processes and their executions, in particular, the concepts of leader–follower pairs and reserving executions, that play a critical role in the lower bound argument and will hopefully be more generally applicable.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Berlin Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-018-0331-9en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Berlin Heidelbergen_US
dc.titleOn the optimal space complexity of consensus for anonymous processesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-09-24T20:58:20Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderSpringer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
dspace.embargo.termsY
dspace.date.submission2020-09-24T20:58:20Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record