| dc.contributor.author | Spencer, Jack | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-12T18:57:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-10-12T18:57:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-03 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-03 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1573-0883 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0031-8116 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/132936 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper develops a form of moral actualism that can explain the procreative asymmetry. Along the way, it defends and explains the attractive asymmetry: the claim that although an impermissible option can be self-conditionally permissible, a permissible option cannot be self-conditionally impermissible. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer Netherlands | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01627-y | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.source | Springer Netherlands | en_US |
| dc.title | The procreative asymmetry and the impossibility of elusive permission | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Spencer, J. The procreative asymmetry and the impossibility of elusive permission. Philos Stud 178, 3819–3842 (2021) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy | |
| dc.relation.journal | Philosophical Studies | en_US |
| dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | en_US |
| dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
| eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
| dc.date.updated | 2021-10-09T03:17:29Z | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. | |
| dspace.embargo.terms | Y | |
| dspace.date.submission | 2021-10-09T03:17:29Z | |
| mit.journal.volume | 178 | en_US |
| mit.license | OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY | |
| mit.metadata.status | Authority Work Needed | en_US |
