Compositional inductive biases in function learning
Author(s)
Schulz, Eric; Tenenbaum, Joshua B; Duvenaud, David; Speekenbrink, Maarten; Gershman, Samuel J
DownloadSubmitted version (798.5Kb)
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
How do people recognize and learn about complex functional structure? Taking inspiration from other areas of cognitive science, we propose that this is achieved by harnessing compositionality: complex structure is decomposed into simpler building blocks. We formalize this idea within the framework of Bayesian regression using a grammar over Gaussian process kernels, and compare this approach with other structure learning approaches. Participants consistently chose compositional (over non-compositional) extrapolations and interpolations of functions. Experiments designed to elicit priors over functional patterns revealed an inductive bias for compositional structure. Compositional functions were perceived as subjectively more predictable than non-compositional functions, and exhibited other signatures of predictability, such as enhanced memorability and reduced numerosity. Taken together, these results support the view that the human intuitive theory of functions is inherently compositional.
Date issued
2017Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory; Center for Brains, Minds, and MachinesJournal
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV