Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Eric
dc.contributor.authorTenenbaum, Joshua B
dc.contributor.authorDuvenaud, David
dc.contributor.authorSpeekenbrink, Maarten
dc.contributor.authorGershman, Samuel J
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-27T19:52:42Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T19:52:42Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133410
dc.description.abstractHow do people recognize and learn about complex functional structure? Taking inspiration from other areas of cognitive science, we propose that this is achieved by harnessing compositionality: complex structure is decomposed into simpler building blocks. We formalize this idea within the framework of Bayesian regression using a grammar over Gaussian process kernels, and compare this approach with other structure learning approaches. Participants consistently chose compositional (over non-compositional) extrapolations and interpolations of functions. Experiments designed to elicit priors over functional patterns revealed an inductive bias for compositional structure. Compositional functions were perceived as subjectively more predictable than non-compositional functions, and exhibited other signatures of predictability, such as enhanced memorability and reduced numerosity. Taken together, these results support the view that the human intuitive theory of functions is inherently compositional.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/J.COGPSYCH.2017.11.002
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcebioRxiv
dc.titleCompositional inductive biases in function learning
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Brains, Minds, and Machines
dc.relation.journalCognitive Psychology
dc.eprint.versionOriginal manuscript
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerReviewed
dc.date.updated2019-09-26T16:18:33Z
dspace.orderedauthorsSchulz, E; Tenenbaum, JB; Duvenaud, D; Speekenbrink, M; Gershman, SJ
dspace.date.submission2019-09-26T16:18:34Z
mit.journal.volume99
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record