Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHow, Jonathan P.
dc.contributor.authorLopez, Brett
dc.contributor.authorLusk, Parker
dc.contributor.authorMorozov, Savva
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-28T17:58:08Z
dc.date.available2021-10-28T17:58:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136723
dc.description.abstract© 2021, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved. Model predictive control (MPC) is an effective method for control of constrained systems but is susceptible to the external disturbances and modeling error often encountered in real-world applications. To address these issues, techniques such as Tube MPC (TMPC) utilize an ancillary offline-generated robust controller to ensure that the system remains within an invariant set, referred to as a tube, around an online-generated trajectory. However, TMPC is unable to modify its tube and ancillary controller in response to changing state-dependent uncertainty, often resulting in overly-conservative solutions. Dynamic Tube MPC (DTMPC) addresses these problems by simultaneously optimizing the desired trajectory and tube geometry online. Building upon this framework, Adaptive DTMPC (ADTMPC) produces better model approximations by reducing model uncertainty, resulting in more accurate control policies. This work presents an experimental analysis and performance evaluation of TMPC, DTMPC, and ADTMPC for an uncertain nonlinear system. In particular, DTMPC is shown to outperform TMPC because it is able to dynamically adjust to changing environments, limiting aggressive control and conservative behavior to only the cases when the constraints and uncertainty require it. Applied to a pendulum testbed, this enables DTMPC to use up to 30% less control effort while achieving up to 80% higher speeds. This performance is further improved by ADTMPC, which reduces the feedback control effort by up to another 35%, while delivering up to 34% better trajectory tracking. This analysis establishes that the DTMPC and ADTMPC frameworks yield significantly more effective robust control policies for systems with changing uncertainty, goals, and operating conditions.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0785en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titlePerformance analysis of adaptive dynamic tube mpcen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHow, Jonathan P., Lopez, Brett, Lusk, Parker and Morozov, Savva. 2021. "Performance analysis of adaptive dynamic tube mpc." AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, 1 PartF.
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.relation.journalAIAA Scitech 2021 Forumen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-04-30T16:38:30Z
dspace.orderedauthorsMorozov, S; Lusk, PC; Lopez, BT; How, JPen_US
dspace.date.submission2021-04-30T16:38:32Z
mit.journal.volume1 PartFen_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record