Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchons-Fonseca, Luciane
dc.contributor.authorLazova, Milena D
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Janet L
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Mary E
dc.contributor.authorGrossman, Alan D
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-18T14:48:48Z
dc.date.available2023-01-18T14:48:48Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/147185
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>DNA replication is essential for all living organisms. Several events can disrupt replication, including DNA damage (e.g., pyrimidine dimers, crosslinking) and so-called “roadblocks” (e.g., DNA-binding proteins or transcription). Bacteria have several well-characterized mechanisms for repairing damaged DNA and then restoring functional replication forks. However, little is known about the repair of stalled or arrested replication forks in the absence of chemical alterations to DNA. Using a library of random transposon insertions in <jats:italic>Bacillus subtilis</jats:italic>, we identified 35 genes that affect the ability of cells to survive exposure to an inhibitor that arrests replication elongation, but does not cause chemical alteration of the DNA. Genes identified include those involved in iron-sulfur homeostasis, cell envelope biogenesis, and DNA repair and recombination. In <jats:italic>B</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>subtilis</jats:italic>, and many bacteria, two nucleases (AddAB and RecJ) are involved in early steps in repairing replication forks arrested by chemical damage to DNA and loss of either nuclease causes increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents. These nucleases resect DNA ends, leading to assembly of the recombinase RecA onto the single-stranded DNA. Notably, we found that disruption of <jats:italic>recJ</jats:italic> increased survival of cells following replication arrest, indicating that in the absence of chemical damage to DNA, RecJ is detrimental to survival. In contrast, and as expected, disruption of <jats:italic>addA</jats:italic> decreased survival of cells following replication arrest, indicating that AddA promotes survival. The different phenotypes of <jats:italic>addA</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>recJ</jats:italic> mutants appeared to be due to differences in assembly of RecA onto DNA. RecJ appeared to promote too much assembly of RecA filaments. Our results indicate that in the absence of chemical damage to DNA, RecA is dispensable for cells to survive replication arrest and that the stable RecA nucleofilaments favored by the RecJ pathway may lead to cell death by preventing proper processing of the arrested replication fork.</jats:p>en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1371/journal.pgen.1010564en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePLoSen_US
dc.titleBeneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arresten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSchons-Fonseca, Luciane, Lazova, Milena D, Smith, Janet L, Anderson, Mary E and Grossman, Alan D. 2022. "Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest." PLOS Genetics, 18 (12).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biologyen_US
dc.relation.journalPLOS Geneticsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2023-01-18T14:35:11Z
dspace.orderedauthorsSchons-Fonseca, L; Lazova, MD; Smith, JL; Anderson, ME; Grossman, ADen_US
dspace.date.submission2023-01-18T14:35:13Z
mit.journal.volume18en_US
mit.journal.issue12en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record