MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological clinical trials

Author(s)
Nakayama, Luis Filipe; Mitchell, William Greig; Shapiro, Skyler; Santiago, Alvina Pauline D.; Phanphruk, Warachaya; Kalua, Khumbo; Celi, Leo Anthony; Regatieri, Caio Vinicius Saito; ... Show more Show less
Thumbnail
Downloade001175.full.pdf (701.9Kb)
Publisher with Creative Commons License

Publisher with Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution

Terms of use
Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Introduction In ophthalmology, clinical trials (CTs) guide the treatment of diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, myopia, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma and keratoconus with distinct presentations, pathological characteristics and responses to treatment in minority populations. Reporting gender and race and ethnicity in healthcare studies is currently recommended by National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines to ensure representativeness and generalisability; however, CT results that include this information have been limited in the past 30 years. The objective of this review is to analyse the sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological phases III and IV CT based on publicly available data. Methods This study included phases III and IV complete ophthalmological CT available from clinicaltrials.org, and describes the country distribution, race and ethnicity description and gender, and funding characteristics. Results After a screening process, we included 654 CTs, with findings that corroborate the previous CT reviews’ findings that most ophthalmological participants are white and from high-income countries. A description of race and ethnicity is reported in 37.1% of studies but less frequently included within the most studied ophthalmological specialty area (cornea, retina, glaucoma and cataracts). The incidence of race and ethnicity reporting has improved during the past 7 years. Discussion Although NIH and FDA promote guidelines to improve generalisability in healthcare studies, the inclusion of race and ethnicity in publications and diverse participants in ophthalmological CT is still limited. Actions from the research community and related stakeholders are necessary to increase representativeness and guarantee generalisability in ophthalmological research results to optimise care and reduce related healthcare disparities.
Date issued
2023-02
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/148464
Department
Harvard--MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology. Laboratory for Computational Physiology
Publisher
BMJ
Citation
Nakayama, Luis Filipe, Mitchell, William Greig, Shapiro, Skyler, Santiago, Alvina Pauline D., Phanphruk, Warachaya et al. 2023. "Sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological clinical trials." 8 (1).
Version: Final published version
ISSN
2397-3269
Keywords
Ophthalmology

Collections
  • MIT Open Access Articles

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.