Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNakayama, Luis Filipe
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, William Greig
dc.contributor.authorShapiro, Skyler
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Alvina Pauline D.
dc.contributor.authorPhanphruk, Warachaya
dc.contributor.authorKalua, Khumbo
dc.contributor.authorCeli, Leo Anthony
dc.contributor.authorRegatieri, Caio Vinicius Saito
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-10T18:06:59Z
dc.date.available2023-03-10T18:06:59Z
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.identifier.issn2397-3269
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/148464
dc.description.abstractIntroduction In ophthalmology, clinical trials (CTs) guide the treatment of diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, myopia, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma and keratoconus with distinct presentations, pathological characteristics and responses to treatment in minority populations. Reporting gender and race and ethnicity in healthcare studies is currently recommended by National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines to ensure representativeness and generalisability; however, CT results that include this information have been limited in the past 30 years. The objective of this review is to analyse the sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological phases III and IV CT based on publicly available data. Methods This study included phases III and IV complete ophthalmological CT available from clinicaltrials.org, and describes the country distribution, race and ethnicity description and gender, and funding characteristics. Results After a screening process, we included 654 CTs, with findings that corroborate the previous CT reviews’ findings that most ophthalmological participants are white and from high-income countries. A description of race and ethnicity is reported in 37.1% of studies but less frequently included within the most studied ophthalmological specialty area (cornea, retina, glaucoma and cataracts). The incidence of race and ethnicity reporting has improved during the past 7 years. Discussion Although NIH and FDA promote guidelines to improve generalisability in healthcare studies, the inclusion of race and ethnicity in publications and diverse participants in ophthalmological CT is still limited. Actions from the research community and related stakeholders are necessary to increase representativeness and guarantee generalisability in ophthalmological research results to optimise care and reduce related healthcare disparities.en_US
dc.publisherBMJen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001175en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceBMJen_US
dc.subjectOphthalmologyen_US
dc.titleSociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological clinical trialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNakayama, Luis Filipe, Mitchell, William Greig, Shapiro, Skyler, Santiago, Alvina Pauline D., Phanphruk, Warachaya et al. 2023. "Sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological clinical trials." 8 (1).
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard--MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology. Laboratory for Computational Physiology
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.date.submission2023-03-10T18:01:33Z
mit.journal.volume8en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record