Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRowe, Mary
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-10T19:57:37Z
dc.date.available2025-03-10T19:57:37Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-14
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/158448
dc.description.abstractOrganizational ombuds usually offer a choice of different options to constituents who call the office with a concern. In serious cases, ombuds might offer formal options such as filing a formal grievance. In addition, the ombuds can offer informal options, such as helping a visitor deal directly with their concern or offering to facilitate discussion with those involved. However, aggrieved persons and proactive bystanders often are very fearful about anyone knowing they have complained. In this situation, a “generic” approach—that focuses on an issue without naming anyone—can help to address the issues involved rather than the individuals. This can be done in ways that shield the privacy of the complainant. In addition to helping individuals, generic options serve affinity groups and the organization by supporting needed systemic improvements. This article discusses how organizational ombuds and other complaint handlers can use generic approaches in their work.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of the International Ombudsman Associationen_US
dc.subjectgeneric options, anonymous complainants, organizational ombuds, systemic changeen_US
dc.titleConsider Generic Options When Complainants and Bystanders Are Fearfulen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMary Rowe, “Consider Generic Options When Complainants and Bystanders Are Fearful,” Journal of the International Ombudsman Association Vol. 16, No. 2 (Mary Rowe special issue, 2023-2024).en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record