Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDesikan, Rahul S.
dc.contributor.authorCabral, Howard J.
dc.contributor.authorHess, Christopher P.
dc.contributor.authorDillon, William P.
dc.contributor.authorGlastonbury, Christine M.
dc.contributor.authorWeiner, Michael W.
dc.contributor.authorSchmansky, Nicholas J.
dc.contributor.authorGreve, Douglas N.
dc.contributor.authorSalat, David H.
dc.contributor.authorBuckner, Randy L.
dc.contributor.authorFischl, Bruce
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-25T20:40:27Z
dc.date.available2012-05-25T20:40:27Z
dc.date.issued2009-05
dc.date.submitted2009-03
dc.identifier.issn0006-8950
dc.identifier.issn1460-2156
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/70955
dc.description.abstractMild cognitive impairment can represent a transitional state between normal ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Non-invasive diagnostic methods are needed to identify mild cognitive impairment individuals for early therapeutic interventions. Our objective was to determine whether automated magnetic resonance imaging-based measures could identify mild cognitive impairment individuals with a high degree of accuracy. Baseline volumetric T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans of 313 individuals from two independent cohorts were examined using automated software tools to identify the volume and mean thickness of 34 neuroanatomic regions. The first cohort included 49 older controls and 48 individuals with mild cognitive impairment, while the second cohort included 94 older controls and 57 mild cognitive impairment individuals. Sixty-five patients with probable Alzheimer's disease were also included for comparison. For the discrimination of mild cognitive impairment, entorhinal cortex thickness, hippocampal volume and supramarginal gyrus thickness demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.91 (specificity 94%, sensitivity 74%, positive likelihood ratio 12.12, negative likelihood ratio 0.29) for the first cohort and an area under the curve of 0.95 (specificity 91%, sensitivity 90%, positive likelihood ratio 10.0, negative likelihood ratio 0.11) for the second cohort. For the discrimination of Alzheimer's disease, these three measures demonstrated an area under the curve of 1.0. The three magnetic resonance imaging measures demonstrated significant correlations with clinical and neuropsychological assessments as well as with cerebrospinal fluid levels of tau, hyperphosphorylated tau and abeta 42 proteins. These results demonstrate that automated magnetic resonance imaging measures can serve as an in vivo surrogate for disease severity, underlying neuropathology and as a non-invasive diagnostic method for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAmerican Federation for Aging Research. Medical Student Training in Aging Research Programen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Center for Research Resources (U.S.) (grant P41-RR14075)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Center for Research Resources (U.S.) (grant R01 RR 16594-01A1)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Center for Research Resources (U.S.) (BIRN Morphometric Project BIRN002, U24 RR021382)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U.S.) (R01 EB001550)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMental Illness and Neuroscience Discovery (MIND) Instituteen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute on Aging (P50 AG05681)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute on Aging (P01 AG03991)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute on Aging (AG021910)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp123en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercialen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5en_US
dc.sourceOxforden_US
dc.titleAutomated MRI measures identify individuals with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's diseaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationDesikan, R. S. et al. “Automated MRI Measures Identify Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease.” Brain 132.8 (2009): 2048–2057. Web. 25 May 2012.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentmove to dc.description.sponsorshipen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.approverFischl, Bruce
dc.contributor.mitauthorBuckner, Randy L.
dc.contributor.mitauthorFischl, Bruce
dc.relation.journalBrainen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsDesikan, R. S.; Cabral, H. J.; Hess, C. P.; Dillon, W. P.; Glastonbury, C. M.; Weiner, M. W.; Schmansky, N. J.; Greve, D. N.; Salat, D. H.; Buckner, R. L.; Fischl, B.en
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record