Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSull, Alan C.
dc.contributor.authorVuong, Laurel N.
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Lori Lyn
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasan, Vivek J.
dc.contributor.authorGorczynska, Iwona
dc.contributor.authorFujimoto, James G.
dc.contributor.authorSchuman, Joel S.
dc.contributor.authorDuker, Jay S.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-15T15:51:45Z
dc.date.available2012-10-15T15:51:45Z
dc.date.issued2010-02
dc.identifier.issn0275-004X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73968
dc.descriptionAuthor Manuscript 2011 February 1.en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to report normal macular thickness measurements and assess reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements acquired by a time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Stratus, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA) and three commercially available spectral/Fourier domain OCT instruments (Cirrus HD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.; RTVue-100, Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA; 3D OCT-1000, Topcon, Inc., Paramus, NJ). Methods: Forty randomly selected eyes of 40 normal, healthy volunteers were imaged. Subjects were scanned twice during 1 visit and a subset of 25 was scanned again within 8 weeks. Retinal thickness measurements were automatically generated by OCT software and recorded after manual correction. Regression and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare agreement between instruments. Reproducibility was analyzed by using intraclass correlation coefficients, and incidence of artifacts was determined. Results: Macular thickness measurements were found to have high reproducibility across all instruments with intraclass correlation coefficients values ranging 84.8% to 94.9% for Stratus OCT, 92.6% to 97.3% for Cirrus Cube, 76.4% to 93.7% for RTVue MM5, 61.1% to 96.8% for MM6, 93.1% to 97.9% for 3D OCT-1000 radial, and 31.5% to 97.5% for 3D macular scans. Incidence of artifacts was higher in spectral/Fourier domain instruments, ranging from 28.75% to 53.16%, compared with 17.46% in Stratus OCT. No significant age or sex trends were found in the measurements. Conclusion: Commercial spectral/Fourier domain OCT instruments provide higher speed and axial resolution than the Stratus OCT, although they vary greatly in scanning protocols and are currently limited in their analysis functions. Further development of segmentation algorithms and quantitative features are needed to assist clinicians in objective use of these newer instruments to manage diseases.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Contract RO1-EY11289-23)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Contract R01-EY13178-07)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Contract P30-EY008098)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-07-1-0101)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-07-1-0014)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181bd2c3ben_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourcePubMed Centralen_US
dc.titleComparison of Spectral/Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments for Assessment of Normal Macular Thicknessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationAlan C. Sull et al. "Comparison of Spectral/Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments for Assessment of Normal Macular Thickness" Retina 30(2):235-245, February 2010.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSrinivasan, Vivek J.
dc.contributor.mitauthorGorczynska, Iwona
dc.contributor.mitauthorFujimoto, James G.
dc.relation.journalRetinaen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsSULL, ALAN C.; VUONG, LAUREL N.; PRICE, LORI LYN; SRINIVASAN, VIVEK J.; GORCZYNSKA, IWONA; FUJIMOTO, JAMES G.; SCHUMAN, JOEL S.; DUKER, JAY S.en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-4357
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record