Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOng, Shyue Ping
dc.contributor.authorChevrier, Vincent L.
dc.contributor.authorHautier, Geoffroy
dc.contributor.authorJain, Anubhav
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Charles Jacob
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sangtae
dc.contributor.authorMa, Xiaohua
dc.contributor.authorCeder, Gerbrand
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-15T20:50:30Z
dc.date.available2012-10-15T20:50:30Z
dc.date.issued2011-08
dc.date.submitted2011-05
dc.identifier.issn1754-5692
dc.identifier.issn1754-5706
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73998
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the potential of Na-ion batteries, we contrast in this work the difference between Na-ion and Li-ion based intercalation chemistries in terms of three key battery properties—voltage, phase stability and diffusion barriers. The compounds investigated comprise the layered AMO2 and AMS2 structures, the olivine and maricite AMPO4 structures, and the NASICON A3V2(PO4)3 structures. The calculated Na voltages for the compounds investigated are 0.18–0.57 V lower than that of the corresponding Li voltages, in agreement with previous experimental data. We believe the observed lower voltages for Na compounds are predominantly a cathodic effect related to the much smaller energy gain from inserting Na into the host structure compared to inserting Li. We also found a relatively strong dependence of battery properties on structural features. In general, the difference between the Na and Li voltage of the same structure, ΔVNa–Li, is less negative for the maricite structures preferred by Na, and more negative for the olivine structures preferred by Li. The layered compounds have the most negative ΔVNa–Li. In terms of phase stability, we found that open structures, such as the layered and NASICON structures, that are better able to accommodate the larger Na+ ion generally have both Na and Li versions of the same compound. For the close-packed AMPO4 structures, our results show that Na generally prefers the maricite structure, while Li prefers the olivine structure, in agreement with previous experimental work. We also found surprising evidence that the barriers for Na+ migration can potentially be lower than that for Li+ migration in the layered structures. Overall, our findings indicate that Na-ion systems can be competitive with Li-ion systems.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Office of Naval Research (Contract N00014-11-1-0212)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Dept. of Energy (Contract DE-FG02 96ER45571)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Dept. of Energy (BATT program under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01782aen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Ceder via Angie Locknaren_US
dc.titleVoltage, Stability and Diffusion Barrier Differences between Sodium-ion and Lithium-ion Intercalation Materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationOng, Shyue Ping et al. “Voltage, Stability and Diffusion Barrier Differences Between Sodium-ion and Lithium-ion Intercalation Materials.” Energy & Environmental Science 4.9 (2011): 3680. Web.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.approverCeder, Gerbrand
dc.contributor.mitauthorCeder, Gerbrand
dc.contributor.mitauthorOng, Shyue Ping
dc.contributor.mitauthorChevrier, Vincent L.
dc.contributor.mitauthorHautier, Geoffroy
dc.contributor.mitauthorJain, Anubhav
dc.contributor.mitauthorMoore, Charles Jacob
dc.contributor.mitauthorKim, Sangtae
dc.contributor.mitauthorMa, Xiaohua
dc.relation.journalEnergy and Environmental Scienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsOng, Shyue Ping; Chevrier, Vincent L.; Hautier, Geoffroy; Jain, Anubhav; Moore, Charles; Kim, Sangtae; Ma, Xiaohua; Ceder, Gerbranden
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7959-8249
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record