Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEvans, Alex J.
dc.contributor.authorAndrews-Hanna, Jeffrey C.
dc.contributor.authorZuber, Maria
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-25T16:27:29Z
dc.date.available2012-10-25T16:27:29Z
dc.date.issued2010-05
dc.date.submitted2009-07
dc.identifier.issn0148-0227
dc.identifier.issn2156-2202
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/74249
dc.description.abstractThe Arabia Terra region, an area of ~1 × 10[superscript 7] km[superscript 2] lying south of the hemispheric dichotomy boundary and centered at (25E, 5N), is a unique physiographic province with topography and crustal thickness intermediate between those of the southern highlands and northern lowlands. Previous workers have identified numerous morphological indicators suggestive of erosion. Using altimetry data returned by the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) on the Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) along with gravity data from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), we place geophysical constraints on the amount of erosion permitted within Arabia Terra. Admittance estimates using a multitaper, spatiospectral localization approach provide a best fit to the observations through degree 50 at an elastic lithosphere thickness of 15 km. The elevation difference between Arabia Terra and the highlands would require as much as 5 km of erosion in certain areas to yield the current topography, neglecting the effects of subsequent flexure. However, incorporating flexural rebound requires substantially more erosion, up to 25 km, in order to reproduce the elevation and crustal thickness deficit of Arabia Terra. Such a large amount of erosion would result in exterior flexural uplift surpassing 1 km and gravity anomalies exceeding observations by ∼60 mGal. Consequently, it is unlikely that Arabia Terra was formed from surface erosion alone. We determine that no more than 3 × 10[superscript 7] km[superscript 3] of material could have been removed from Arabia Terra, while 1.7 × 10[superscript 8] km[superscript 3] of erosion is required to explain the observed crustal thickness.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1029/2009je003469en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleGeophysical limitations on the erosion history within Arabia Terraen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationEvans, A. J., J. C. Andrews-Hanna, and M. T. Zuber. “Geophysical Limitations on the Erosion History Within Arabia Terra.” Journal of Geophysical Research 115.E5 (2010). ©2010 American Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorEvans, Alex J.
dc.contributor.mitauthorAndrews-Hanna, Jeffrey C.
dc.contributor.mitauthorZuber, Maria
dc.relation.journalJournal of Geophysical Research Planetsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsEvans, A. J.; Andrews-Hanna, J. C.; Zuber, M. T.en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2652-8017
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record