MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm

Author(s)
Edwards, Dylan J.; Dipietro, Laura; Demirtas-Tatlidede, Asli; Medeiros, Ana H.; Thickbroom, Gary W.; Mastaglia, Francis L.; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro; Krebs, Hermano Igo; ... Show more Show less
Thumbnail
Download1743-0003-11-31.pdf (765.0Kb)
PUBLISHER_CC

Publisher with Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution

Terms of use
Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Background: A peripheral nerve stimulus can enhance or suppress the evoked response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) depending on the latency of the preceding peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) pulse. Similarly, somatosensory afference from the passively moving limb can transiently alter corticomotor excitability, in a phase-dependent manner. The repeated association of PNS with TMS is known to modulate corticomotor excitability; however, it is unknown whether repeated passive-movement associative stimulation (MAS) has similar effects. Methods: In a proof-of-principle study, using a cross-over design, seven healthy subjects received in separate sessions: (1) TMS (120% of the resting motor threshold-RMT, optimal site for Flexor Carpi Radialis) with muscle at rest; (2) TMS paired with cyclic passive movement during extension cyclic passive movement (400 pairs, 1 Hz), with the intervention order randomly assigned. Normality was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, then compared to pre-intervention baseline using repeated measures ANOVA with a Dunnet multiple comparisons test. Results: MAS led to a progressive and significant decrease in the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude over the intervention (R[superscript 2] = 0.6665, P < 0.0001), which was not evident with TMS alone (R[superscript 2] = 0.0068, P = 0.641). Post-intervention excitability reduction, only present with MAS intervention, remained for 20min (0-10min 68.2 ± 4.9%, P < 0.05; 10-20min = 73.3 ± 9.7%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The association of somatosensory afference from the moving limb with TMS over primary motor cortex in healthy subjects can be used to modulate corticomotor excitability, and may have therapeutic implications.
Date issued
2014-03
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86096
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Journal
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Publisher
BioMed Central Ltd
Citation
Edwards, Dylan J, Laura Dipietro, Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede, Ana H Medeiros, Gary W Thickbroom, Francis L Mastaglia, Hermano I Krebs, and Alvaro Pascual-Leone. “Movement-Generated Afference Paired with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: An Associative Stimulation Paradigm.” J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 11, no. 1 (2014): 31.
Version: Final published version
ISSN
1743-0003

Collections
  • MIT Open Access Articles

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.