Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Dylan J.
dc.contributor.authorDipietro, Laura
dc.contributor.authorDemirtas-Tatlidede, Asli
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros, Ana H.
dc.contributor.authorThickbroom, Gary W.
dc.contributor.authorMastaglia, Francis L.
dc.contributor.authorPascual-Leone, Alvaro
dc.contributor.authorKrebs, Hermano Igo
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-11T13:41:25Z
dc.date.available2014-04-11T13:41:25Z
dc.date.issued2014-03
dc.date.submitted2013-07
dc.identifier.issn1743-0003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86096
dc.description.abstractBackground: A peripheral nerve stimulus can enhance or suppress the evoked response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) depending on the latency of the preceding peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) pulse. Similarly, somatosensory afference from the passively moving limb can transiently alter corticomotor excitability, in a phase-dependent manner. The repeated association of PNS with TMS is known to modulate corticomotor excitability; however, it is unknown whether repeated passive-movement associative stimulation (MAS) has similar effects. Methods: In a proof-of-principle study, using a cross-over design, seven healthy subjects received in separate sessions: (1) TMS (120% of the resting motor threshold-RMT, optimal site for Flexor Carpi Radialis) with muscle at rest; (2) TMS paired with cyclic passive movement during extension cyclic passive movement (400 pairs, 1 Hz), with the intervention order randomly assigned. Normality was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, then compared to pre-intervention baseline using repeated measures ANOVA with a Dunnet multiple comparisons test. Results: MAS led to a progressive and significant decrease in the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude over the intervention (R[superscript 2] = 0.6665, P < 0.0001), which was not evident with TMS alone (R[superscript 2] = 0.0068, P = 0.641). Post-intervention excitability reduction, only present with MAS intervention, remained for 20min (0-10min 68.2 ± 4.9%, P < 0.05; 10-20min = 73.3 ± 9.7%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The association of somatosensory afference from the moving limb with TMS over primary motor cortex in healthy subjects can be used to modulate corticomotor excitability, and may have therapeutic implications.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant RO1 HD045343)en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-31en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0en_US
dc.sourceBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.titleMovement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigmen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationEdwards, Dylan J, Laura Dipietro, Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede, Ana H Medeiros, Gary W Thickbroom, Francis L Mastaglia, Hermano I Krebs, and Alvaro Pascual-Leone. “Movement-Generated Afference Paired with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: An Associative Stimulation Paradigm.” J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 11, no. 1 (2014): 31.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorDipietro, Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorKrebs, Hermano Igoen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2014-04-04T07:07:18Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderDylan J Edwards et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dspace.orderedauthorsEdwards, Dylan J; Dipietro, Laura; Demirtas-Tatlidede, Asli; Medeiros, Ana H; Thickbroom, Gary W; Mastaglia, Francis L; Krebs, Hermano I; Pascual-Leone, Alvaroen_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record